I’m finally free from assessments and only have two exams to sit for!! YaY! Since I’ve been lacking in updates recently, I decided to share something I found in my attempt to do some research for a completely NON SEXUAL related topic, I stumbled across this article which gave me a good minute of entertainment =P
Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality?
M PETERS, G RHODES, L W SIMMONS. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Mar 2008. Vol. 21, Iss. 2; pg. 572
Abstract (Summary)
The psychological mechanisms underlying attractiveness judgements in humans are thought to be evolved adaptations for finding a high quality mate. The phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis proposes that females obtain reliable information on male fertility from male expression of sexual traits. A previous study of Spanish men reported that facial attractiveness was positively associated with semen quality. We aimed to determine whether this effect was widespread by examining a large sample of Australian men. We also extended our study to determine whether cues to semen quality are provided by components of attractiveness: masculinity, averageness and symmetry. Each male participant was photographed and provided a semen sample that was analyzed for sperm morphology, motility and concentration. Two independent sets of women rated the male photographs for attractiveness, and three further sets of 12 women rated the photographs for masculinity, symmetry or averageness. We found no significant correlations between semen quality parameters and attractiveness or attractive traits. Although male physical attractiveness may signal aspects of mate quality, our results suggest that phenotype-linked cues to male fertility may not be general across human populations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
It’s so interesting to know that scientists are still in their never ending quest in their attempt to answer the big question: “WHY?”
- Why do we like attractive people?
- Why do we think certain features are more attractive than others?
- Why is there a market for plastic surgery?
So now we know that attractiveness does not link to higher fertility rate, what does this mean exactly? Could it possibly mean that there’s no need for attractive people in our world? I mean, what if all the attractive people turned out to have a lower fertility rate? And considering Australia needs to boost its’ population, we want to have the best chance of having more babies… So does that mean lots of ugly babies?
Okay okay, I know it’s a bit premature to jump to any assumptions like ugly babies. But the study could very possibly suggest that, now that we have all these different means of fertilisation and passing on dodgy aka inferior genes, maybe evolution has created more attractive people to combat this… If you think about it, if it had not been for plastic surgery, ugly people will breed with their ugly people gene pool and the attractive people have their own attractive gene pool. Eventually one of them will kick the other in the ass, maybe even enslave them for being different.
But we humans are smarter, we try to beat the system by creating this wonderful market for plastics. We figured since we’ve fixed up homes, we’ve fixed small pox, we’ve fixed peoples’ minds, so why don’t we just fix up everything else?
Or can’t that be done?
Do we recall the story of the husband who sued his wife for an “ugly baby”? You figure it out.
Some beauties are a cut above the rest.(Knight Ridder Newspapers)
Byline: Lori Borgman
A husband in China was so upset his wife gave birth to an “ugly” baby girl that he accused her of having an affair. She confessed to saying, “I do” to plastic surgeons multiple times before saying, “I do,” to her husband at the altar. He filed for divorce and sued for deceit.